Skip to content

Comparing Like with Like: Navigating Complex Solution Assessments

Navigating the landscape of complex solutions presents an often daunting challenge for potential customers who seek to make direct comparisons between different offerings. How do you assist them in making an equitable evaluation?

Recently, I’ve been dedicating time to competitive analyses, comparing our toolset with alternative options in the market. While I don’t have direct access to test our competitors’ solutions, I rely on publicly available information, such as competitor seminars, marketing collateral, LinkedIn posts, and website content. Notably, the information I encounter is frequently contradictory. Marketing materials, for instance, might paint a rosier picture of certain functionalities than what is indicated by other resources like seminars or website copy. Consequently, there is a need for objective, factual interpretation to provide a realistic overview—both for our own self-improvement and to offer prospective clients unbiased information.

Consider the example of a “Line-item three-way match to order and receipt.” A competitor may claim to facilitate three-way matching at the line-item level. However, upon closer scrutiny, it becomes evident that this is possible only when the product codes on both the invoice and order lines match. This poses a problem for many customers who may not have access to their supplier’s product codes or vice versa, making a match impracticable. In contrast, we employ a proprietary matching method that doesn’t necessitate product code alignment.

Both we and our competitors assert the capability for line-item level three-way matching, but the reality is far from equal. Marketing teams may celebrate these functionalities as directly comparable, yet it’s crucial to understand that our solution offers a far greater degree of flexibility and capability.

In summary, the task of comparing complex solutions is not as straightforward as it may initially appear. It is essential for both providers and customers to dig deeper into the features and limitations of each toolset, to truly compare like with like. This not only improves the integrity of the competitive landscape but also ensures that customers are making informed decisions based on factual, unbiased information.

Join the conversation

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *